Upcoming Virtual Events

Get together (virtually!), learn together, act together!

Register for the Zoom HERE

Featuring Kendra Davenport Cotton 

(Chief Operating Officer, New Georgia Project Action Fund)

In conversation with Diane Robertson 

(DNC Deputy Finance Chair and NC Democratic Party Executive Committee member) 

and introductions by Dr. Aimy Steele 

(2020 candidate for NC House District 82)  

Co-hosted by NoC and FLIP NC

After years of strategic, collaborative organizing, Georgia activists see their state turning blue. Let’s find out how they did it!

Kendra Davenport Cotton is an experienced campaigner and nonprofit leader in Georgia who also has a deep understanding of the North Carolina political landscape, having studied and worked here for 16 years. She will help us learn from Georgia’s path as we build our own grassroots strategy to elect Democrats. 

The New Georgia Project Action Fund is the advocacy arm of the New Georgia Project, which has registered over 500,000 voters. NGP was founded by Stacey Abrams and is led by Nsé Ufot.

How Can We Win More?

Many of us want to figure out what we can do to win more. It’s great that we have a Democratic President and administration, a majority in the House, and a sorta majority in the Senate. But to pass progressive policies, we need bigger majorities. And, here in NC, we still have a GOP-controlled General Assembly.

I want to bring your attention to two excellent talks about how we can win. The first was Elaine Berry’s talk at our annual meeting in December. She was the campaign manager for Ricky Hurtado’s successful campaign to win a seat in the NC House in a pretty red district.

The second was an event sponsored by Neighbors on Call and Flip NC. Aimy Steele interviewed the chair and the executive director of the Wisconsin Democratic Party about the changes they’ve been making that are transforming the WDP into a more grassroots organization.

Please take the time to watch both of these excellent talks. I hope you’ll find them as informative and inspiring as I did.

How Can We Win More? – Progressive Caucus of the NC Democratic Party (

First published at

Share this:

3 thoughts on “How Can We Win More?”

  1. MAUREEN KURTZThank you Lee. I attended both of these inspiring talks. Some of my takeaways (although admittedly some of these may be just my own ideas or ideas I heard elsewhere):
    1. The WI Dems pay their chair. Thus Ben had full time to devote to organizing, much of which he devoted to fundraising so they could hire local organizers all over the state.
    2. The WI Dems built up their own campaign structure, then invited the Biden org to join them, which they did! Instead of ignoring them which most presidential campaigns do. Thus the hard work and local knowledge of the WI Dems contributed to Biden’s win.
    3. NCDP should pay its chair. In addition, the chair should be forbidden to run for political office while serving as chair of the NCDP. Maybe we can discuss this as a caucus?
    4. It sounds like Aimy Steele is going to play a role in a NC chapter of Fair Fight. I’m excited to see how that plays out.
    5. I wasn’t too impressed with Ricky’s win before I heard Elaine Berry’s talk, because his district had been redistricted to lean Dem. But without her hard work starting with Erica McAdoo’s 2018 campaign and as chair of the Alamance County DP, they still could have lost, due to the long history of the party ignoring that district (until 2018), COVID-19, and voter suppression. Elaine got her start politics by taking free training in campaign mgmt. There are many groups offering this type of training and all who are interested can take advantage!
    6. Not exactly from these talks, but related to winning: NCDP should resolve to keep the DCCC and DSCC out of our primaries. We need free and fair primaries without these extremely powerful groups interfering. They have a poor track record (examples, Dan McCready and Cal Cunningham). Would love to discuss as a caucus.
  2. LEE NACKMANI agree with everything you say here except about not being impressed with Ricky’s win. I’ve been pushing on #3 at the State Executive Council, where I made a motion to pay the state chair. It was referred to a committee, which came back with the recommendation that we pay the state chair what legislators get, which is around $13K. I argued that this amount is pretty much useless in terms of allowing a person who is not either retired or wealthy to be able to afford to work as chair full time. Although there were others who supported this view, the Council voted to approve the legislator-equivalent pay (plus some expense reimbursement). So, this is, imo, only a tiny step forward and I intend to keep pushing on it for future years.

Protect the Results: Count Every Vote

Nov. 5, 2020

Progressives and Democrats gathered in New Bern to stand up for democracy and show eastern North Carolina that every vote deserves to be counted.

Any discussion of fair elections must include an understanding of Voting Rights.  All citizens of the US 18 and over have been granted the right to vote, except some felons and some who are mentally incapacitated. Citizens in US territories cannot vote for president in the general election. The history of voter suppression began in the south, as the white elite tried to stack the deck in their favor and make sure it stayed that way.

  • The 15th amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1870, gave black men the right to vote. 
  • For the next 95 years, white men passed a series of “Jim Crow” laws, which basically disenfranchised black men.
  • In 1965, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act. It outlawed discriminatory voting practices. Lyndon B. Johnson, a Southerner, said “we cannot have government for all the people until we first make certain it is government of and by all the people.” The Voting Rights Act of 1965 abolished all remaining deterrents to voting for black men and authorized Federal supervision of voter registration where necessary. It was extended and strengthened 3 times before 1982. Who was alive at that time?
  • In 2013, key provisions of the Voting Rights Act were gutted by the Supreme Court , including one that prohibited states known for discriminatory practices from changing their election laws without an okay from the federal government.
    • Voter suppression took on a life of its own, purging eligible voters from the rolls, cutting back early and absentee voting, closing polling places, and using strict voter ID requirements – disenfranchising voters of color at every turn.
    • Officials purged nearly 4 million more names between 2014 and 2016 than between 2006 and 2008 — a 33 percent increase. Officials in states that used to be under federal oversight purged voters from the rolls at a rate 40 percent higher than those in states with no history of voter suppression.
    • Election officials in Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, and Virginia have all conducted illegal voter roll purges. In Virginia in 2013, nearly 39,000 voters were removed from the rolls when state officials relied on a faulty database.
    • Since the Voting Rights Act was gutted in 2013, 1,688 polling places have been shuttered in those states. Texas officials closed 750 polling places. Arizona and Georgia were almost as bad. Those closures were mostly in communities of color.
    • In Texas, officials in the 50 counties that gained the most Black and Latinx residents between 2012 and 2018 closed 542 polling sites, compared to just 34 closures in the 50 counties that gained the fewest Black and Latinx residents. In Georgia’s 2020 primary, 80 polling places were closed in Atlanta, home to Georgia’s largest Black population — forcing 16,000 residents to use a single polling place.
    • Texas Republicans put a voter ID law into effect almost immediately following the decision — a law that they had been prevented from passing in 2011 when the Voting Rights Act was still intact. That law has been struck down five times since it went into effect, one that intentionally discriminates against Black and Latinx voters.
    • In Georgia, the state’s restrictive “exact match” ID law — requiring a voter’s ID to exactly match the name on their registration, down to any dots or dashes — allowed state officials to throw out 53,000 majority-Black voter registrations less than a month before the state’s tight 2018 gubernatorial race with Stacey Abrams, who would have been the country’s first Black woman governor.
    • In North Carolina, a court found that the state’s voter ID law “targeted African Americans with almost surgical precision,” and struck the law down the entire law.
  • I’m not  telling you all this to make you discouraged.  Here’s why I’m telling you.  
  • Raise your hand if you were born after 2000. I’m speaking now to you.  I am looking for the next generation of voters. Of activists  Of guardians of democracy. Of people who care enough about the future of NC, the future of our country, and the future of our planet, to run for office. The future is decided by those who show up, by those who are at the table.  Be one of those people. Start small, run for Board of Education, Board of Elections, town councils, commissioners. That is where you can influence local decisions and get experience.  Learn how government works so that you can be a player. Don’t be afraid. If you don’t do it, others will make decisions for you, and they won’t always be in your favor.  They will be decisions made by politicians who are paid off with dark money to favor corporations instead of we the people. If you think your vote doesn’t matter, look back at the last 4 years. We need you to step up to the plate.

Voting Down the Ballot: Why It’s Important

Taking Our Power Back: Voting Down the Ballot


Presidential Primary Election Ballots Mailed - El Paso County Colorado

This election season, we know that most folks are paying very close attention to the federal level of government. The presidency, races for Congress, and potential Supreme Court nominations are all at stake in a critical moment of America’s history. But what about the candidates that aren’t at the top of the ballot?

As a voter, one of the most important things you can do this election is voting the entire ballot.

What does voting down the ballot mean?

Simply put, voting down the ballot means filling out the entirety of the ballot. At the top of the ballot are those who represent us on a national level, such as those in Congress, or the president. Those races get the most attention, while the local representatives “down the ballot” are either ignored or filled in at random or solely along party lines.

Why vote down the ballot? Isn’t the national government more important?

Short answer: it’s not. The United States is a federal republicThat means at some point long ago, the individual states agreed to unionize under one national government while retaining their own set of powers and sovereignty over their state. This division of powers is intended to keep any single branch on a federal, state, or local level from becoming too powerful by dispersing authority among multiple levels of government. Sound complicated? It is. But those complications are meant to protect us by making it difficult for any single interest to consolidate power.

However, that hasn’t stopped efforts to do just that, especially in local elections where the margins are much closer than they are on the national level. Much fewer people vote on the local level. That means a single vote has far more power in your backyard than it does at the federal level. This also leaves smaller communities at risk of being overrun by outside interests.

Why don’t more folks talk about this?

More often than not, folks don’t pay attention to their representatives until an election year rolls around, if at all. Neither party has really done a good job explaining why all political engagement matters as they work to serve their own interests. The Democratic Party tends to focus a lot of attention on the presidential candidates and governors without investing in local governments. During Barack Obama’s time as president, over 1,000 state legislature seats were lost by Democrats across the country. On the other hand, the 1% have bankrolled down-ballot races in the Republican Party’s favor for decades in exchange for protection of their interests and lax enforcement of rules and regulations that protect the people. They know that real power lies in local jurisdictions, so they throw their money around to get their way. When local leaders aren’t invested in or voted in fairly, it’s the folks down home in small and rural communities that suffer harm the most.

Whether it’s county commissioner, school board, or sheriff, the roles that down-ballot races have on local and rural communities far outweigh federal influence. From voting rights to voter ID laws, school quality, tax-free corporations, affordable housing, women’s health, or Medicaid expansion, it’s our representatives on the state and local level that have the greatest control over our day-to-day lives and well-being.

Speaking of voting rights, it’s state legislatures that have control over congressional district boundaries- not the federal government. In North Carolina, we’ve been hit hard by politicians who have worked to dilute our power and muffle the voices of working-class Black, Brown, and white folks. Every 10 years after the census, these districts are redrawn. Those who were elected in 2010 worked very hard to reduce the change you are able to affect with your vote. Politicians shouldn’t get to choose their own voters or who’s vote matters more. Now is YOUR chance to take our power back, but that can only happen when folks vote the entire ballot.

What is the role of local officials in my community?

Source: North Carolina Center for County Research

County Commissioners

In North Carolina, each county is governed by a 3-9 person board of county commissioners. The board of commissioners sets the county property tax rate and adopts the budget each year. They also establish county policy by adopting resolutions and local ordinances (laws). Our state also uses the council-manager form of government, where commissioners focus on county policy and hire (not elect) a professional manager to oversee day-to-day operations.

School Board / Board of Education

Public education is a state-level function. As North Carolina has 115 school districts, the state legislature cannot attend to day-to-day school matters. Instead, they appropriate money and delegate the authority for descion-making to the School Board (also called Board of Education).

The local Board of Education is a entity with corporate status. Although made of individual members, the Board as a whole can sue and be sued, purchase and condemn property, and receive money and goods. No single member, committee, or group of board members may act on behalf of the board except by decision of the majority, meeting in an official session called and conducted according to the provisions of the statutes that created the board and govern its operation.

What can I do?

Wherever you are, know that you have the power to install representatives that best represent you.
Make your voice heard by registering to vote, filling out your census, and downloading a mail-in ballot request form. Make sure you know who your candidates are and what they represent.

Our members host events where you can learn more about our local political landscape from someone who knows what matters to you. Join us, when you can. We’ll build power for our communities together.

This election, we’ll need all of us to tap into our collective power and make things better for our community. Want to engage your friends and neighbors about politics with kindness and compassion?

Sign up for our RVT program here.

Share this:

Like this:


Answers to 18 frequent questions about 2020 elections in NCFebruary 24, 2020In “News”

Voting by Mail: A Down Home How-ToAugust 20, 2020In “Election 2020”


A Proposal to Reopen by First Saving America

This material originally appeared on the OnTheTopic blog at and on

The current debate about when and how to reopen schools and colleges misses the point. Of course we have to reopen schools. Just like we have to reopen businesses. Not only do we have to educate our kids, but parents can’t work without schools for their kids. Schools and the economy are linked: No schools, diminished economy; diminished economy, too little money for feeding, housing, and educating kids and their families. It is a downward cycle.

As businesses are pushing workers to return, helped by pressure from expiration of enhanced unemployment benefits, workers will get sick and neither be able to work nor to care for their children. And, customers will be afraid because of the sick workers, further driving business down. As more workers become ill, more customers will be afraid. Another downward cycle.

School, business, and health are inextricably linked. You can’t solve one problem without solving them all. This may sound hopeless, but it’s not. It is a national emergency that requires bold, direct action. First save America, then reopen.

Here’s my proposal in a nutshell: Implement a strict nationwide lockdown to defeat the virus and support people’s needs during the lockdown with large, direct payments.

The rest is detail. (But I hope you’ll read it!)

Breaking the Downward Cycle

The solution is simple, but difficult. It will take courage, real patriotism (not just the flag-waving kind), and shared purpose across the land. Here are the steps:

1. Admit that we’ve bungled our response to COVID

Our nation’s political leaders must admit, at least to themselves and in their hearts, that we’ve bungled our response to COVID. The disease is spreading fast, many people are dying, many more are being damaged for life, our kids aren’t being educated, and our real economy (not the stock market) is failing. Our country is being diminished by the day and we can only solve it by working together and with urgency.

Good leaders have the courage to admit error and to change course. Voters can forgive making mistakes, but they won’t forgive leaders who stick their heads in the sand while awaiting a magical solution.

2. Tell the truth going forward

All of our political leaders must tell the truth going forward. Our leaders must establish credibility, which is sorely lacking now. Credibility will encourage people to follow the “tough love” needed to get through this crisis together. Lack of credibility will even make people reluctant to accept good news, like an effective and safe vaccine, because we won’t know whether the good news is true or yet another lie.

3. Implement a nationwide lockdown

We know the drill. Only “essential” businesses, or businesses where work-from-home is possible, stay open. Define “essential” narrowly, based on what’s needed to keep people fed and housed. People generally stay at home. Require masks and social distancing elsewhere.

We started this in March, but didn’t follow through nationwide and reopened too quickly. But our experience this spring and the experience in other countries shows that a lockdown will stop or nearly stop the spread of the disease, saving many lives. Moreover, reducing transmission to a low-enough level is the only way to get schools open and the economy going again.

4. Implement a massive public relations campaign

This second lockdown can’t be half-hearted like the first one. Bombard the public with specific, consistent, insistent messaging through all channels. Political leaders of all persuasions need to get on board and lead by example. Everywhere. All the time. This is what patriotism is about: shared sacrifice in service to the nation. We’ll know this is happening when we see the talking heads on both CNN and Fox News giving the same recommendations to their viewers.

5. Define criteria for reopening

Define stringent criteria for when lockdown can be eased and when it must be strengthened. Listen to the epidemiologists. Intuition from politicians doesn’t pass muster in such a complex situation. We have people who know how to model transmission and can tell us when it is safe to reopen various sectors of our economy. Listen to them.

6. Sustain people

The direct impact of a lockdown on people already living paycheck-to-paycheck is devastating. To make a lockdown feasible, the federal government must sustain such people. This is a big topic, which I discuss next.

Sustaining People

Let’s keep in mind the goal — sustaining people — and ignore the side goals that have plagued previous COVID relief bills. We’re not trying to prop up large corporations, the stock market, or even the local pizzeria. Such goals might be laudable, but that’s not what I’m talking about here. I’m talking about how we keep people fed and housed.

Give Everyone Money

The simplest approach is to give everyone money. Yes, I said everyone. Why? Because determining who really needs support is complex, politically charged, and bureaucratic. Just look at the CARES Act Payroll Protection Program’s (PPP) attempt to help small businesses: In practice, getting money required that a small business had the right kind of relationship with a bank and access to knowledgeable help from lawyers or accountants. The result was that many businesses that needed help didn’t get it and many that didn’t need help got it anyway. Making it simple helps make it fair.

Making it simple also eliminates the need to pay large fees to banks ⏤ PPP fees could exceed $24B.

So, let’s just bite the bullet and support everyone.

How Much Money?

Reasonable people will choose different subsidy amounts depending on their priorities. My priorities are that no one should go hungry for lack of money, people should not face eviction and homelessness, and our consumer-based economy should not totally collapse. Here’s my rationale.

Median personal income in the US was $33,700 per year in 2018. By definition, half of working-age individuals earn less than this and half earn more. Let’s give each individual the median income, $2,800 per month, for the duration of the lockdown.

The lowest-earning half of individuals, those most likely to face hunger, eviction, and homelessness without help, would be better off than before, even if they lost their jobs. The lockdown would no longer throw them and their families into dire poverty. Some would even be able to accumulate some rainy-day savings or pay down high-interest debt.

The higher-earning half of individuals would be better off if they kept their jobs, but not if they lost their jobs.

What Would It Cost?

In December 2018, there were 206.7 million working-age people. So, this level of support would cost about $579B per month. Federal income tax revenue on these payments would offset some of the cost.

Can We Afford It?

Yes. As a comparison, the CARES Act is estimated to cost about $1.8 trillion, assuming that some federally-guaranteed loans are paid back, more if the loans are not repaid. If we can afford the CARES Act, we can afford to do this. A three-month lockdown would cost less than the CARES Act.

We could get into a political argument about whether it is good for the US to increase its deficit spending. For 40 years, Republican dogma has been that deficits cause inflation, yet when Republicans are in power they increase deficit spending, primarily to help corporations and the very wealthy, giving us many data points about deficit spending and inflation. There’s no evidence that deficit spending in the US causes inflation.

This is especially so now, when the Federal Reserve has been “printing money” by making huge bond purchases. These bond purchases prop up the economy by keeping interest rates at historic lows (around .5% for 10-year Treasuries). Most of that printed money is flowing into the stock market, not helping people. If we can “afford” to spend money for that purpose, we can afford to spend money to help people directly.

Can We Afford Not to Do It?

We must stop the pandemic. If we continue to let it fester, it will destroy our country, much like other plagues and cataclysmic events throughout time have destroyed past empires. Self-preservation demands that we take action and the only action we can take now is to follow public health recommendations for a lockdown.

But we can only implement a lockdown if we reduce its devastating impact on much of the populace. If we fail to help people through the lockdown, we will not be able to sustain it for long enough to defeat the pandemic, which will again send the economy into a tailspin.

Moreover, we have to keep services provided by local and state governments alive. Taxes, mostly sales and property taxes, fund these services. If people are not earning, they’re not spending and paying sales taxes. If people are not able to pay their rent or their mortgages, they’re not paying property taxes. Putting money in the hands of the populace not only keeps them fed and housed, but keeps critical services funded. (Further help to state and local governments may nevertheless be necessary.)

There is no other choice if we want to save America.

What About the Politics?

The political issue is whether Congress is willing to spend money to directly help people as opposed to the usual indirect approach of funneling money to banks and well-connected large corporations, and hoping it trickles down. The CARES Act shows that there is some hope for the more direct approach: About a quarter of CARES Act money went directly to people (see a breakdown here), so there’s some willingness to spend money to help people.

But, the news is not all good. Republicans in Congress are now worrying out loud that enhanced unemployment benefits cause recipients to be lazy and not want to work. Even if their worry were justified (there’s evidence that it is not), so what? When the lockdown is over, people will need to return to work.

Importantly, we need to recognize that during the lockdown we want most people to stay at home, not showing up at work while possibly infected because they need money to pay the rent and feed their family. That’s why generous, direct funding of households is essential.

We Ignore Need for Corporations So Why Not for People?

Congress (both parties) seems happy to send huge amounts of money to large corporations that don’t really need it. Why would we do that but at the same time only help people who “need” it?

One rationale politicians use is to preserve jobs. But large corporations have access to private sources of funding. Corporate borrowing is as cheap as it has ever been. Besides, it would be good if some corporations restructure through bankruptcy: Maybe corporate leaders would learn to keep adequate cash reserves rather than spending too much of their earnings on stock buybacks.

Importantly, the absence of strong opposition to the CARES Act’s Economic Impact Payments to most households ($1200 per adult earning $99,000 or less, $500 per child), regardless of income level under $99,000 or employment status, gives hope that members of Congress could be comfortable that their electorate would perceive this proposed program as fair.

What About Businesses?

Businesses only survive if they have products or services to sell that attract customers with money to spend. Consumers drive large parts of our economy. Ensuring that consumers have money to spend will help most of our businesses. And, ultimately, no subsidy will help businesses that don’t have customers willing and able to buy. One way to support local businesses during the lockdown is for households who don’t need their whole subsidy to give money to support local businesses that are important to them. This seems preferable than the bureaucracy-heavy PPP approach.

There will still be people who believe in the (discredited) trickledown theory of economics, that the best way to help others is to give money to corporations and the wealthy. Such people, especially those in high-income households who will receive but not need the subsidy, should put their money where their mouth is by donating their household subsidy to their favorite businesses or corporations.

Will Essential Workers Be Willing to Work?

Since everyone will be receiving a subsidy payment, why would anyone want to work in an “essential” job? There are several reasons. First, employees will know that they’ll need employment post-lockdown, which might provide incentive to keep working. Second, and more importantly, essential businesses that need more employees during the lockdown will raise wages to attract them. Individuals will balance extra earnings against risk, with workers in different risk categories possibly making different decisions.

Likewise, essential businesses will make varying decisions about how they operate during the lockdown. Some may cut back products and services that they provide to avoid needing to hire more workers; others may raise wages to attract more workers so they can maintain their usual services. Among those that raise wages, some may raise prices to maintain or increase profits, while others will absorb the temporarily increased labor costs as a way to endear customers to them post-lockdown.

What About the Financial System?

In the 2007 recession, banks were pummeled by inadequate capital with which to withstand the deluge of loan defaults. Supposedly, they’re in better shape now, but we shouldn’t count on them having adequate capital to withstand massive defaults. This proposal puts money into the hands of people with credit card and mortgage debt, which will reduce the risk of bank failures or the need for federal government bank rescues.


This is a two-step proposal to save America: (1) Defeat the virus by a serious lockdown and (2) help people through it by giving them plenty of money to meet their needs (and possibly more) during the lockdown.

It gives money directly to the people and it gives every working-age person the same amount regardless of whether or not they “need” it. This keeps the program simple, free of excessive bureaucracy, and fair. It costs a lot but delivers a lot. It puts decision-making about what businesses to support in the hands of the people who know best, not in the hands of lobbyists and campaign contributors. Both Democrats and Republicans should like parts of it.

Reality is disrupting the ideology of today’s Republican Party.

Reality is disrupting the ideology of today’s Republican Party.

For a generation, Republicans have tried to unravel the activist government under which Americans have lived since the 1930s, when Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt created a government that regulated business, provided a basic social safety net, and invested in infrastructure. From the beginning, that government was enormously popular. Both Republicans and Democrats believed that the principle behind it—that the country worked best when government protected and defended ordinary Americans—was permanent.

But the ideologues who now control the Republican Party have always wanted to get rid of this New Deal state and go back to the world of the 1920s, when businessmen ran the government. They believe that government regulation and taxation is an assault on their liberty, because it restricts their ability to make money.

They have won office not by convincing Americans to give up their own government benefits—most Americans actually like clean water and Social Security and safe bridges—but by selling a narrative in which “Liberals” are trying to undermine the country by stealing the tax dollars of hardworking Americans—quietly understood to be white men—and redistributing them to lazy people who want handouts, not-so-quietly understood to be people of color and feminist women. According to this narrative, legislation that protects ordinary Americans simply redistributes wealth. It is “socialism,” or “communism.”

Meanwhile, Republican policies have actually redistributed wealth upward. When voters began to turn against those policies, Republicans upped the ante, saying that “Liberals” were simply buying Black votes with handouts, or, as Carly Fiorina said in a 2016 debate, planning to butcher babies and sell their body parts. To make sure Republicans stayed in power, they suppressed voting by people likely to vote Democratic, and gerrymandered states so that even if Democrats won a majority of votes, they would have a minority of representatives.

This system rewarded those who moved to the right, not to the middle. It gave them Donald Trump as a 2016 candidate, who talked of Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists and treated women not as equals but as objects either for sex or derision.

And, although as a candidate Trump talked about making taxes fairer, improving health care, and helping those struggling economically, in fact as president he has done more to bring about the destruction of the New Deal state than most of his predecessors. He has slashed regulations, given a huge tax cut to the wealthy, and gutted the government.

If the end of the New Deal state is going to usher in a new era of peace and prosperity, it should be now.

Instead, the gutting of our government destroyed our carefully constructed pandemic response teams and plans, leaving America vulnerable to the coronavirus. Pressed to take the lead on combatting the virus, the administration refused to use federal power, and instead relied on “public-private partnerships” which meant states were largely on their own. When governors tried to take over, the Republican objection to government regulation, cultivated over a generation, had people refusing to wear masks or follow government instructions.

As the rest of the world watches in horror, we have suffered more than 4 million infections, and are approaching 150,000 deaths.

The pandemic also crashed the economy as businesses shut down to avoid infections. It threw more than 20 million Americans out of work. Republican ideology says the government has no business supporting ordinary Americans: they should work to survive, even if that means they have to take the risk of contracting Covid-19. Schools should open, businesses should get up and going, and the economy should rebuild. As Texas’s lieutenant governor Dan Patrick said to Fox News Channel personality Tucker Carlson in March, grandparents should be willing to contract coronavirus for the U.S. to “get back to work.”

The coronavirus has brought the Republican narrative up against reality. Just 32% of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of the coronavirus, and only 38% of the country think the economy is good. Americans believe that the government should have done a better job managing the pandemic, and they do not believe they should risk their lives for the economy.

To try to deflect attention from the failure of his approach to the coronavirus, Trump is once, again, escalating the narrative. He has launched an offensive against Democratic cities, trying to convince voters he is protecting them from “violent anarchists” coddled by Democrats. He is using federal law enforcement officers in unprecedented ways, not to quell protests, but to escalate them. In Portland, Oregon, as officers have used tear gas, less-than-lethal munitions (which nonetheless fractured a man’s skull), and batons to attack protesters, the events, which had fallen to a few hundred attendees, grew again into the thousands. And now the administration is planning to send in more officers, to escalate further.

The Republicans’ ideology is also making it impossible for them to deal with the economy. We are on the verge of a catastrophe as the $600 weekly federal bonus attached to state unemployment benefits runs out this week just as the moratorium on evictions for an inability to pay rent ends. At the same time, state and local budgets, hammered by the pandemic, will mean more layoffs.

The House passed a $3 trillion bill in May to address these issues, along with providing more money to combat the coronavirus, but Republicans in the Senate rejected it out of hand. Today on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) went back to his ideological roots. “The only objective Democrats have is to defeat Donald Trump, and they’ve cynically decided the best way to defeat Donald Trump is shut down every business in America, shut down every school in America,” he said. House Speaker “Nancy Pelosi talks about working men and women. What she’s proposing is keeping working men and women from working.” “Her objectives are shoveling cash at the problem and shutting America down.”

Instead, both Trump and Cruz want a payroll tax cut, which will do little to stimulate the economy since the tens of millions who have lost their jobs would not see any money, and this late in the year much of the tax has already been paid. But the payroll tax cut is popular among Republican ideologues because it funds Social Security and Medicare. Cut it, and those programs take a hit.

Today Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin took to the Sunday talk shows to try to reassure people that the Republicans would, in fact, manage to cobble together a relief bill in the next few days (after not writing one in the last two months). They are talking about passing piecemeal measures, but, recognizing that this means Republicans will call all the shots, Pelosi says no.

Meadows and Mnuchin say they want liability protection for businesses and schools if they open and people get Covid-19. They were also clear they would not agree to extending the $600 federal addition to state unemployment benefits, arguing that it simply “paid people to stay home.” They say they want to guarantee people 70% of their wages, but the reason the earlier bill had a flat $600 payment was because it appeared impossible for states to administer a complicated program based on a percentage, so this might well just be a straw argument.

The Republican approach to handling the coronavirus and the economy is apparently not to turn to our government, but to put our heads down, go on as usual, and hope for a vaccine. What will end the pandemic is “not masks. It’s not shutting down the economy,” Meadows said. “Hopefully it is American ingenuity that will allow for therapies and vaccines to ultimately conquer this.”




You’re on the free list for Letters from an American. For the full experience, become a paying subscriber.


© 2020 Heather Cox Richardson Unsubscribe
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104

Systematic Oppression

NCDP Auxiliaries and Caucuses’ Statement on Systemic Oppression

by Lee Nackman

The North Carolina Democratic Party Auxiliaries and Caucuses join in unity to condemn the horrific and senseless murder of George Floyd, at the hands of a white Minneapolis Police Officer, while other officers stood by doing nothing. We also condemn the ongoing harassment and violence inflicted on black and brown lives, LGBTQ lives, union organizers, veterans, and religious minorities, across this country, including here in North Carolina.

We’ve watched, first in disbelief, but now in horror and disgust, as we and our siblings of color are attacked, beaten, and murdered by those who are supposed to protect and defend us. Attacked by others filled with hate, emboldened by a President whose words have encouraged the violence. Murdered by the gun-toting “militia” threatening us, shouting that people of color should “go back to where you came from”, and inciting persecution of our African-American community, our Native American community, our Hispanic/Latinx community, our American Asian and Pacific Islander (AAPI) community, our LGBTQ+ community, our Jewish community, and our Muslim community. Harassment and name calling have regressed to assault, bombings and murder.

In 2020, at least 12 Transgender Women and Men, most Black and other people of color, have been murdered.

The President’s inflammatory words, such as calling COVID-19 the “Chinese virus,” have incited threats and harassment of our AAPI community, even against children. A family of three, including 3- and 6-year-old children, were stabbed in Midlands, Texas.

As reported by the CDC through 2019, our Native American community has the 2nd highest death rate caused by police encounters, followed by our Hispanic/Latinx community. In words and actions, the current Administration demonizes our Hispanic/Latinx communities with immigration policies that separate mothers from their children, puts children in cages, deports Hispanic/Latinx Veterans, ignores unsanitary and unhealthy conditions in their detention centers and denies our Dreamers protections and a pathway to citizenship.

Anti-Muslim and Anti-Semitic incidents and attacks are increasing dramatically. These acts of violence are encouraged by the rhetoric and hate speech that emanates from leaders at the highest levels. Instead of calming the waters through empathetic leadership, they fan the flames of hate.

Let us remember George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade (Black Trans Man), Monika Diamond (Trans Black Woman from Charlotte), Andre Pablo and Jordan Anchondo, Arturo Benavides, plus 19 other Hispanic/Latinx people shot during the massacre in El Paso, Texas, and so many others across all marginalized communities. We will continue to work work in solidarity to end institutional racism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, and anti-Semitism.

Let us also remember the vast contributions to our country of immigrants, organized Labor and our nation’s Veterans, as we work in solidarity to end suppression of labor unions and to care for our nation’s Veterans.

We echo the previous statements made by North Carolina Democratic Party Chairman, Wayne Goodwin, and African-American Caucus Chairwoman, Felita Donnell, that, “Only through sustained activism and progress will we be able to heal these deep wounds and build a country where all people are treated as equal. As long as black men and women are unsafe in our communities, the NCDP will continue to stand alongside them in the struggle for justice.”

We add to their statements the Native American, Hispanic/Latinx, LGBTQ, AAPI, Jewish-American, and Muslim- American communities, Labor Organizers, and our Veterans.

The NCDP Auxiliaries and Caucuses, Stand Together in Solidarity for Freedom, Equality, Equity, and our inalienable right, provided in the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, Liberty and Justice for All! Libertad y Justicia para todos!! If one of us is hurt, we are all hurt!

We will lift ​Our Voices​ NOW and ​Our VOTES​ ​in NOVEMBER!

Organization Contacts:

Felita Donnell, ​Chair,​ African American Caucus – NCDP – ​
Gracie Galloway, ​Chair​, AAPI Caucus of the NCDP – ​
Jarrett Patrick,​ President,​ CollegeDemocrats –​
Julia Buckner, ​President,​ Democratic Women of NC – ​​ / ​
David Salazar, ​President,​ Hispanic American Caucus of NC – ​
Randolph Voller, ​President,​ Labor Caucus of NCDP – ​
Ginger Walker, ​President,​ LGBTQ Democrats of NC – ​​ / ​
Crystal Cavalier, ​President,​ Native American Caucus – ​
Lee R. Nackman,​ President,​ Progressive Caucus of NCDP –​​ / ​
Tom Rothrock, ​President​, NC Senior Democrats – ​​ / ​
Janice Covington Allison, ​Chair​, Transgender Political Caucus – ​
Wendy May, ​Chair,​ Veterans and Military Families Caucus – ​
DeVonte Wilson, ​President​, Young Democrats of NC – ​​ / ​

Lee Nackman | June 10, 2020 at 11:41 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL:

Black Lives Matter

Diane Lemieux

June 7, 2020

What Will It Take?

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Liberty and justice for all. This is the elephant in the room. And we all know in our hearts that it is not true.

We all have heard lately about the deaths of George Floyd, Sandra Bland, Philando Castile, Eric Garner, Korryn Gaines, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, David McAtee and so many others at the hands of police or white supremists. Yet nothing has changed. This week, the majority of the people have been peacefully protesting about George Floyd’s death and racial injustice, and are being met with more police violence. That doesn’t seem to be a response indicative of a better understanding or leading to a better resolution of the problem.

What kind of country do we live in that doesn’t care about its citizens being killed by its police, who are supposed to protect us? What kind of people see what is happening and turn their heads, saying, that’s not my problem? What does it take for people to care?

It takes an understanding of HISTORY. An understanding of how African Americans have been treated throughout the past 400 years, from slavery and being counted as 3/5ths of a person to today’s police violence, mass incarceration, economic, environmental and racial discrimination, access to health care and voter suppression.

It takes EMPATHY. Do you deny any of the ways they have been and continue to be treated? Try upping your empathy quotient. I know you have heard the saying “Walk a mile in my shoes.” But what does it really mean? First, you have to make yourself vulnerable by accepting that maybe you don’t know how someone else has it. Then you have to ask them to tell you what their life is like. Then you need to believe it. After this, it might be easier to truly understand their point of view and where it comes from. Gaining empathy can be a rocky road for some, but with it, we will become one people, a nation of mutual respect and understanding.

It is going to take recognition of our WHITE PRIVILEGE to get past saying, “That’s not my problem.” Are you saying right now, “I don’t have white privilege!”? Consider this. Can you go out at night in your car without worrying you’ll be arrested or shot? Can you walk around your block without people wondering if you’re suspicious? Do you worry if your children will come home at night without becoming victims of police violence? Can you go bird watching, walk through a white neighborhood or go to a public park, without the police being called on you? Can you go jogging without worrying about being shot?  What if your car breaks down; should you call the police for help? Have you had “the talk” with your kids about what can happen to them when they’re out in public because of the color of their skin? Have the police come into your house without permission and shot your family? These are just some of the things that black people live with every day.  And you don’t.  That is white privilege.

This quote from the Southern Coalition for Social Justice Co-interim Executive Directors Allison Riggs and Ryan Roberson sums it up well. “Change will only come about when the cost of benefiting from a system of oppression that has plagued this nation becomes too high for those in power.”

We have the power to make the cost too high for those who would keep things the same. No matter how much those who have benefited try to ignore and distract us, this problem has reared its head and is not going away. The time has come to fix it.


Not One More Murder

The Progressive Democrats of Orange County have issued a statement, copied below.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Progressive Democrats of Orange County stand in solidarity with our brothers and sisters who continue to be the victims of racially motivated discrimination, violence and murder. We add our voices to the millions of Americans who believe in and fight for an end to the historical and institutional racism that is a bloody stain spread across our nation.

We add our voices to the calls for justice. We will not be silenced until systemic racism is banished and every person has the basic human rights of a free and fair society – equal justice, access to quality health care, housing and education, equal opportunities for employment and equal environmental protections. We must undo economic oppression from a system that flows profits from the hard work of the many into the hands of the few.

We mourn with the families and communities whose men, women and children have been murdered by the racist police state, died from neglect by the racist health care industry and wrongly incarcerated by the racist criminal justice system.

We will remember and speak the names of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Philando Castile, Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin, Jonathan Ferrell, and so many more.

This litany of death and devastation must end. White Supremacy must end. Discrimination against people of color, oppression of those living in poverty and gender-based injustice must end.

We call on all of those who care about justice to raise their voices, loudly and continuously, until our country dismantles all racist and oppressive systems, and to exercise our rights by voting out any leaders who will not immediately work to undo all forms of discrimination, including voter suppression.

We are better than this. It’s time to prove it.

On behalf of PDOC – Rebecca Cerese, Susan Siegel, Tony Wikrent, Keith Cartwright, Kathy Kaufman, Wamiq Chowdhury, Dan Brenner, Marguerite Most, Lee Nackman